Spryntify
Your question
Should I move my family across the country for a 40% pay rise?
Open the 3D explorer
Across the lenses

3 patterns to sit with.

What the lenses had in common. Sharpest when a pattern names a tension you hadn’t fully named yourself — weakest when it summarises something you already know.

  1. 01 Warning

    The salary is masking the real variables

    Oblique strategies and Honda's Super Cub both push the same point: optimise on the wrong variable and you ship the wrong product. Pretend the pay rise is 0% and see what's left of the decision.

    From Eno & Schmidt's Oblique Strategies Honda's Super Cub

  2. 02 Warning

    Watch for resonance with existing strain

    Tacoma Narrows and the Trojan horse together: big moves don't fail by being too large. They fail by amplifying a weakness you already had. Diagnose the almost-fine before deciding.

    From Tacoma Narrows Bridge The Trojan Horse

  3. 03 Opportunity

    A family is a local-rules system

    Murmuration says the move isn't a single decision; it's a re-set of every local rule. Map what survives intact and what has to be rebuilt — for each person — before the salary number is allowed to be the deciding voice.

    From A Starling Murmuration

The substance

The five lenses themselves.

Often the sharpest provocation lives inside a single lens, not in the synthesis above. Skim them; one tends to land harder than the others.

Eno & Schmidt's Oblique Strategies

When stuck, draw a card. Let an unrelated instruction redirect you.

Read this lens

What this lens reveals

Brian Eno's Oblique Strategies are random external instructions designed to break the inside-the-problem rut. You're trying to optimise a multi-dimensional family decision through one variable — pay. Try the oblique instruction: 'pretend the pay rise is 0% and the relocation is mandatory.' Or 'pretend the role is the same in your current city.' The constraints expose what the salary number is hiding.

Try this soon

Tell your partner: 'imagine the offer is identical except the salary is the same as today. Would we still move?' Their first answer — uncoached, unfiltered — is the data the salary number is masking.

Go deeper three provocations to sit with
  1. If the pay rise were 0% but everything else about the role and the place were the same, would you go?
  2. If the same role appeared in your current city tomorrow at the current salary, would you take it?
  3. Which member of the family would you be optimising for — and have you actually asked them?
About this lens what made this interesting to humanity

1975 · Brian Eno, Peter Schmidt

Eno and Schmidt's deck of cards — 'Honour thy error as a hidden intention', 'Use an old idea', 'Discard an axiom', 'What would your closest friend do?' — was made for studio sessions where the obvious next move had been worn out. The trick is the cards are deliberately oblique: not domain-specific advice, but provocations from far enough sideways that the mind has to twist to apply them. The twist is where the new direction comes from.

The principle: When you're inside a problem, your next thought is constrained by the previous thought. A random external instruction breaks that chain. The advice doesn't need to be 'right' — it needs to be other.

A Starling Murmuration

A thousand turns, no one giving orders.

Read this lens

What this lens reveals

A starling murmuration's coherent behaviour comes from each bird following three simple rules with its nearest neighbours — alignment, separation, cohesion. A family is the same kind of local-rule system. The relocation isn't a household decision; it's a perturbation of the local rules — kids' friends, your partner's job network, the dentist who knows you, the parents who can babysit. The salary doesn't change those rules. The move does.

Try this soon

Write a one-page table: 'what survives the move' vs 'what has to be rebuilt' for each family member. Make your partner do the same independently. Compare. The differences are the actual conversation.

Go deeper three provocations to sit with
  1. Which local rules — friendships, routines, professional networks — would survive the move intact?
  2. Which would have to be rebuilt from scratch — and how long does rebuilding take honestly, not optimistically?
  3. Whose local rules are most disrupted by the move — and is that fairly distributed?
About this lens what made this interesting to humanity

timeless · starlings

A murmuration of starlings — tens of thousands of birds wheeling as one — is generated by an absurdly simple rule. Each bird tracks the position and velocity of roughly seven of its nearest neighbours and adjusts to match. No leader, no plan, no shared model of the flock. The cathedral-scale shapes emerge bottom-up from a tiny local rule, applied in parallel, in real time. Most attempts to imitate the look by writing top-down choreography fail.

The principle: Sometimes large coherent behaviour is the product of a small local rule running in many places at once. Trying to design the whole shape will be slower than tuning the per-actor rule and letting the shape happen.

Tacoma Narrows Bridge

The failure mode no one thought to model.

Read this lens

What this lens reveals

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapsed not because of overload but because of resonance — the wind matched the bridge's natural oscillation frequency and the modest, regular force became destructive. Major life moves don't usually fail catastrophically; they fail by hitting resonance with an existing strain. The marriage that was almost fine. The kid who was almost settled. The job stress that was almost manageable. 40% more pay matched against any of those frequencies can amplify the wrong way.

Try this soon

Identify the three things currently most stressed in your life that aren't about the move. Ask honestly: does the move amplify or relieve each? Two of three amplifying is your answer.

Go deeper three provocations to sit with
  1. What's currently almost-fine in your life that a major move could push out of tolerance?
  2. When in the past have you taken on a big new commitment that hit resonance with an existing strain? What broke?
  3. Is the pay rise mostly about money, or about something else that the money is a proxy for — recognition, escape, reset?
About this lens what made this interesting to humanity

1940 · Leon Moisseiff, bridge engineers

The Tacoma Narrows suspension bridge opened in July 1940. By November the deck was twisting visibly in moderate winds — a phenomenon called aeroelastic flutter that bridge engineers of the time did not know to design against. The bridge tore itself apart on camera. Every suspension bridge built since has been tested for the failure mode no one modelled in 1940.

The principle: The catastrophic failure modes are the ones not yet in the textbook. Designing against everything you know about does not protect you from the thing you don't know about. New systems make new failure modes; the price of being first is paying for the modelling.

The Trojan Horse

Win by getting them to carry you through the gate.

Read this lens

What this lens reveals

Troy's walls were not breached by the obvious siege. They fell because the city accepted the gift it had been warned about — wheeled it inside, willingly. The 40% pay rise is the horse. It's a great gift. It also gets through your walls because you wheel it in yourself; nobody is going to stop you. The cost will not appear in the offer letter — it will appear later, inside the city you've already opened.

Try this soon

Find one person who has taken a similar relocation-for-pay move in the last five years. Ask them, in detail, what the offer letter didn't mention. Buy them dinner; the answer is in what they don't volunteer at first.

Go deeper three provocations to sit with
  1. What would the cost of this move have to be for you to decline it? Have you priced that?
  2. Why is this offer this good? Is the salary compensating you for something specific the company knows you don't yet?
  3. Whose advice would have caught the wooden-horse pattern if you'd asked them last month?
About this lens what made this interesting to humanity

-1200 · Odysseus, the Greeks, Troy

After ten years of siege, the Greeks left a gigantic wooden horse outside Troy and sailed away. The Trojans, against the warnings of Cassandra and Laocoön, brought the trophy inside their walls and celebrated. At night, the Greeks hidden in its belly opened the gates from within. The defence the Trojans had held for a decade was undone by something they invited in themselves.

The principle: The defence that holds against external attack is often defeated by an invitation. The threat that gets through is the one disguised as an upgrade.

Honda's Super Cub

The product you didn't mean to sell becomes the company.

Read this lens

What this lens reveals

Honda came to the US planning to sell large motorcycles and discovered that the small step-through scooter they used internally to get around — the Super Cub — was what Americans actually wanted. They almost shipped the wrong product because they only watched their own intent, not what people gravitated to. Apply it: in your career, watch what you've actually moved toward, not what you've planned. The relocation matches your planned career narrative. Does it match what you've actually been drawn to?

Try this soon

List the three career decisions in the last decade you're most glad you made. Tag each one as 'primarily about money' or 'primarily about something else.' The pattern will be obvious. Compare to where this move would fall.

Go deeper three provocations to sit with
  1. In the last five years, which moves have you taken that genuinely energised you — and how many of them were primarily about pay?
  2. If you'd been offered this move three years ago at the same salary, would you have taken it then?
  3. What are you actually optimising for — and have you ever said it out loud?
About this lens what made this interesting to humanity

1959 · Soichiro Honda, American Honda Motor

Honda entered the US market in 1959 to sell big motorcycles. The little 50cc Super Cubs the staff rode around LA on errands kept attracting buyers; the Sears sporting-goods buyer asked about them. Honda shifted its whole strategy and sold half a million Super Cubs in five years. The product they had not been trying to sell became the company.

The principle: Watch what people actually try to buy from you. The product you intend to sell is a hypothesis; the product they want is data. When the data contradicts the intention, the data is right.

Also considered

Lenses ranked relevant but kept off the exploration — the runner-up reading. Each links to the lens itself, not an applied reading of your question.

  • Method

    The Pre-Mortem

    Imagine the project has already failed. Now write the obituary.

  • Myth

    Odysseus and the Sirens

    Bind yourself in advance to the decision you'll later wish to break.

  • Statecraft

    The Marshall Plan

    Pay to rebuild the enemy you just beat.

  • Engineering

    Three Mile Island

    Trusting the gauge that was lying.

  • Science

    3M's Failed Glue Becoming the Post-it Note

    A weak version of the thing you wanted may solve a problem you didn't know you had.

  • Method

    The Ship of Theseus

    Replace every plank and ask if it's still your ship.

  • Nature

    The Peppered Moth

    Change your color before the world changes back.

  • Business

    Intel Walks Away From Memory

    If we got fired, what would the new guy do? Then do it.

Explore in 3D

drag · scroll to zoom · click anything

Explore another question